Sounds good. And FWIW, we are soon working on an update/replacement of RFC 7437.
On 10/7/18, 6:11 AM, "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jari,
Thanks for the new version.
I checked, and you seem to have captured all my points.
Best,
Adrian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 05 October 2018 17:37
> To: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx; iasa2-chairs@xxxxxxxx; iasa20@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-
> update@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the
> Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice
>
> Adrian,
>
> Many thanks for your perceptive review.
>
> I have adopted your suggestions in my copy of the draft.
>
> One follow-up below:
>
> > Section 2
> >
> > IETF rules regarding recalls and other NomCom-related processes
> > continue to apply [RFC7437].
> >
> > Pedantic, but you can't quite get away with this because the NomCom
> > processes in 7437 did not apply to pure IETF Trust appointments.
> >
> > How about...
> >
> > The processes regarding NomCom appointments and recalls of Trustees
> > for the IETF Trust follow those described in [RFC7437].
>
> That’s much better, and this was an important catch.
>
> > Does this mean this document updates 7437?
>
> I think not, because this document uses 7437… would be happy to hear if people
> think otherwise.
>
> Jari
