Le 15/06/2018 à 01:30, Mark Andrews a écrit :
On 15 Jun 2018, at 2:29 am, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Le 14/06/2018 à 07:45, Alexandre Petrescu a écrit :
Le 13/06/2018 à 20:32, Russ Housley a écrit :
Alex:
I have just tried again: if I submit just the xml then the web page
complains in red about title and draft name. If I submit both the xml
and the txt then it accepts it.
The complain in red is this:
Could not extract a valid draft revision from the upload. To fix this
in a text upload, please make sure that the full draft name including
revision number appears centered on its own line below the document
title on the first page. In an xml upload, please make sure that the
top-level <rfc/> element has a docName attribute which provides the
full draft name including revision number.
Others have had success submitting just the .xml file.
Looking at your .xml file, you need to remove the ".txt" from the docName as follows:
OLD:
<rfc category="std"
docName="draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-23.txt"
ipr="trust200902">
NEW:
<rfc category="std"
docName="draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-23"
ipr="trust200902">
I have tried to not use the .txt extension in the docName.
The submission was accepted, without asking the txt file.
I think the question is in my interpretation of that 'full draft name' in the error message above. It means to me a file name with txt extension.
Maybe 'full draft name' means just the name of draft but without the txt extension.
.txt, .xml, .html, .pdf etc. are the format of the document encoded into the filename.
You have "<name>.<format>”.
Yes, from an abstract layer.
But from a mundane point of view:
Among 'draft-person.txt' and 'draft-person'
which one is a 'full draft name'?
Alex
Alex
I will try that.
Alex
Russ
