Re: Possible BofF question -- I18n (was: Re: Possible OBF question -- I18n)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 05:13:53PM +0200, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> On 1 Jun 2018, at 17:10, Nico Williams wrote:
> 
> > Doesn't seem like the end of the world to me.  Maybe there is no sense of urgency to IDNA improvements.
> >
> > Require that documents have I18N Considerations sections, require review by an I18N directorate, and you'll see how quickly participants who used to not give a damn about I18 will come around, learn what they have to, and get their I18N work done.  Suddenly the I18N directorate will be in demand.
> 
> Exactly this was what happened, which made IDNA2008 updates at

Er, exactly what is what happened?
I don't remember many drafts going by the IESG with I18N
Considerations sections...

-Ben

> IANA be blocked. IAB have now asked me as  the appointed expert to
> move things again, which I will do now actually(!) and we'll see
> how many will show up this time. Last time exactly three people.
> Out of which I was one.
> 
>    Patrik


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux