Re: Possible BofF question -- I18n (was: Re: Possible OBF question -- I18n)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31 May 2018, at 4:56, John C Klensin wrote:

> So my alternate hypothesis and reason for floating the BOF idea starts by assuming that, whether people can find some small
> amount of support or are dumb and/or committed enough to do the work anyway, the needed documents can and will be written and hence that the problem is getting adequate review to convince the IESG and the IETF community that those documents have been sufficiently checked and vetted to make publication --including as standards track when appropriate -- plausible and a
> reasonable expectation.

The serious question here is if IETF do have enough competence in I18N space or if IETF should drop that ball and give to some other SDO.

   Patrik

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux