Re: Internet Drafts' Destiney.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 08:31:50PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Here's what grep says about previous discussions since Nov 2016:
> 
> > % egrep -i '(IPv10|krp|When the IETF can discuss|Re: Individual Draft Submissions.)' * | wc -l
> >      271
> > %
> 
> Sergeant-at-arms, could you please do something?  This is wasting 
> peoples' time.

Well, we already had
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg102743.html
and
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg103024.html ,
and the current thread so far don't seem to support an RFC 3683
posting rights action.  I don't think that "I wish my document got
more review" is grounds for restricting mailing list posting
privileges, until it becomes abusive/inappropriate due to volume or
other issues.

So maybe you could say more on what "something" you had in mind, and
what BCP justifies it.  (I'm happy to hear that on the saa@xxxxxxxx
list, since presumably we don't need to further contribute to the
traffic on ietf@xxxxxxxx.)

-Ben




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux