As I just told Ted privately, all what I'm trying to do is to ask good minds to evaluate the ideas, if I don't believe that the best minds are here I wouldn't ask for evaluation at least maybe there is something needs modification or something more to add. I'm not forcing people to show interest, but maybe someone will find the idea interesting, I feel it is not good to submit drafts to a reputable organization such as the IETF and find no response, that's all. -----Original Message----- From: Ole Jacobsen [mailto:olejacobsen@xxxxxx] Sent: Monday, May 28, 2018 7:51 PM To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Michel Py <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; ietf@xxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Internet Drafts' Destiney. On Mon, 28 May 2018, Khaled Omar wrote: > It is better to say something good and responsible other than saying > trivial repeated words because these words represents only your > culture and yourself. > > I feel sorry for the people who are reading this. > "Culture" is indeed the key phrase here. The IETF has its own culture, its own way of developing standards/drafts/whatever. This has been repeatedly explained to you, yet you've chosen a different approach and now you're asking the IETF to engage. I am sorry, but it just doesn't work that way. Perhaps it should, but that's not currently the way things work. Ole
