wfm thanks Scott > On Apr 10, 2018, at 10:11 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Scott, > > Thanks for your review. Please see below. > > > On 10.04.18 15:03, Scott Bradner wrote: >> Reviewer: Scott Bradner >> Review result: Has Nits >> >> I did an OPS-DIR review of Manufacturer Usage Description Specification < >> draft-ietf-opsawg-mud > The specification is well written and clear (I also >> agree with Robert Spark's nits). >> >> One suggestion about document organization: I would either move the discussion >> of what should be done if the MUD controller can not retrieve the MUD file for >> some reason or another out of the security considerations section to after >> section 1.9 or at least include a forward pointer to the discussion. >> > > I think this is a good point. Section 1.6 ok with you? > > Eliot > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
