Hi Scott, Thanks for your review. Please see below. On 10.04.18 15:03, Scott Bradner wrote: > Reviewer: Scott Bradner > Review result: Has Nits > > I did an OPS-DIR review of Manufacturer Usage Description Specification < > draft-ietf-opsawg-mud > The specification is well written and clear (I also > agree with Robert Spark's nits). > > One suggestion about document organization: I would either move the discussion > of what should be done if the MUD controller can not retrieve the MUD file for > some reason or another out of the security considerations section to after > section 1.9 or at least include a forward pointer to the discussion. > I think this is a good point. Section 1.6 ok with you? Eliot
