> Now, to use an extreme example, if someone wants to sit in a WG > meeting with a bag over his or her head and never say anything or even > hum or demonstrate enthusiasm or distaste through body language, I > don't care if they can opt out from begin photographed (with or > without the bag). I don't care if they sign the blue sheets either. > But as soon as they start making Contributions or engage in any other > contacts or behavior that could influence decisions in the standards > process, I believe that the community's interest in being able to > identify who or what participated in those decisions and how becomes > important, important enough to counter the assumption that personal > preferences or needs for privacy should be paramount. does this solve a problem we actually have? we as ask them to sign an attendance sheet, wear a badge, and state their name at the mic. we meed mug shots too? should we do iris scans, fingerprints, and dna swabs? where does it stop? randy
