On 3/2/18 8:13 PM, John R Levine wrote:
But I'm seeing complex branching tree proposals about who's allowed to
object to photgraphy in what contexts, how it's supposed to be
signalled, and what to do about it. I'm on the IAOC. If I have a
no-photo lanyard or no lanyard (I'm an old nerd with shirt pockets to
which one can clip a badge) what happens to the plenary video? Is it
OK to pixellate me or do I have to be completely blacked out, or do we
not publish that section of the video, or am I on the no-no-photo list
or what? These are not questions that I think it's productive to
explore.
I agree that these are not productive questions to explore. The proposed
policy doesn't cover video or group shots, and is pretty clear that
absence of an "opt-out" signal = absence of an "opt out" signal. You're
making strawmen in the classical sense[1], and that's simply unhelpful.
/a
___
[1]
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/169/Strawman-Fallacy
