Hi, On 06.02.18 03:28, Pete Resnick wrote: > > That a pretty substantial change to a piece of text that took a great > deal of back and forth on which to come to rough consensus. Perhaps > Eliot could suggest some text to satisfy your concern that the > requirement is for more than just the facility, without having to > re-hash the whole issue. Unfortunately I do not. I think the intent here is cover the bear minimum requirements we need, and otherwise continue to trust in the IASA that they really are going to take good care of our participants. In short, my suggestion is to run with the current text, and if we have a problem later, make a chcange Eliot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature