Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think the meetings would be a lot more productive if a w.g. could
> have a meeting at the start of the week, work on the the issues during
> the week, send updates to the mailing list, have email and face to face
> discussions, and then have a second session at the end of the week to
> get consensus. Clearly, impossible to schedule this with our current
> number of working groups, but I think it would make for a more
> productive week.
I have repeatedly suggested this to the IESG, most recently last week...
Every WG gets a 1hr slot Mon/Tue (Wed), with *FULL* consideration of
conflicts. Then a second (1-2h) slot later in the week, with much more
minimal concern for conflicts.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature