Dave Crocker <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It is fast looking as if the ability to sustain a large and very > well-attended network of interconnected remote hubs might become a > necessity rather than merely an appealing alternative... +1 (and this will require some formal process for mike queuing at the "interconnected remote hubs".) IMHO, what's lacking is _only_ the will to make it happen. ;^) -- John Leslie <john@xxxxxxx>