Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12/04/2017 15:30, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> Right, so this is why it's better for everyone to be remote.
> Except that the IETF funding model requires attendees to pay their
> meeting fee.
That's orthogonal, but a very good point.
And it's why turning SFO into a large "remote hub" (with a fee, and cookies) might make sense.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature