Jared, man, read the newspapers. On 4/4/17 10:46 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 09:42:57PM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote: >> Hi Nico, >> >> On 04/04/17 21:24, Nico Williams wrote: >>> My unstated point was that the US border situation is not really >>> different from anywhere else. >> I disagree. I think that as of now, of the places in which >> we're likely to have face-to-face meetings, the uncertainty >> with respect to rule-changes involved in future US meetings >> is much higher than other places. Again, that's only in terms >> of places in which we're likely to meet in the next N years. >> That's a mega-negative for US-based meetings IMO. > I welcome the data that is being collected vs all the > armchair responses. > > This reminds me of the IPv6-only question, there's the > zero users that were on the IPv6-only ssid in chicago. This may > be a real issue, or not. > > I think the thread can end until the data is reported > and we can then provide our commentary on that. How do you gather data when the circumstances are changing day in and day out? Here's the latest fun. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/apr/04/trump-extreme-vetting-visitors-to-us-share-contacts-passwords The implication being that someone could be turned away at the border based on private political views. Eliot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature