On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 09:42:57PM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Hi Nico, > > On 04/04/17 21:24, Nico Williams wrote: > > My unstated point was that the US border situation is not really > > different from anywhere else. > > I disagree. I think that as of now, of the places in which > we're likely to have face-to-face meetings, the uncertainty > with respect to rule-changes involved in future US meetings > is much higher than other places. Again, that's only in terms > of places in which we're likely to meet in the next N years. > That's a mega-negative for US-based meetings IMO. I welcome the data that is being collected vs all the armchair responses. This reminds me of the IPv6-only question, there's the zero users that were on the IPv6-only ssid in chicago. This may be a real issue, or not. I think the thread can end until the data is reported and we can then provide our commentary on that. - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.