Even if we treat encapsulation in new IPv6 header as only an option ?
Thx
R.
On Mar 31, 2017 12:46, "Suresh Krishnan" <suresh.krishnan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Robert,On Mar 31, 2017, at 12:01 PM, Robert Raszuk <robert@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi Suresh,As you requested one of many quotes from the draft which your clarification to 2460bis directly contradicts with:This include either: A host originating an IPv6 packet. An SR domain ingress router encapsulating a received IPv6 packet into an outer IPv6 header followed by an SRH.Excellent. Thanks for pointing out the exact text. I can confirm that this text *is compliant* with the RFC2460bis text.ThanksSuresh