Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08

[Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Robert,

On Mar 31, 2017, at 9:11 AM, Robert Raszuk <robert@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I do not understand how 2460bis makes it "easier" if proposed change to the text directly tries to prohibit what is described in a document already long time back accepted as a 6man working group draft.

First of all, adopting something as a working group document only means that it is a starting point. Adoption of a document does not mean that there is WG agrees with all the text in the document. That is why the document goes under WG change control.

Secondly, I have no idea what you are talking about in this specific case. What work in 

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-06

do you think is prohibited by this text? Can please provide a text quote from the draft?

Thanks

Suresh

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>