On 1/30/17 8:14 AM, Michael StJohns wrote: > I would like to > suggest that we (the IAB and IESG and IETF Chair) request the ISOC draft > a message along the lines of what the ACM and IACR and others have > already written. This would include such details as the affect on the > IETF's meetings and the ISOC's outreach program and would ask them to > incorporate suggestions from the IETF community on content (but leaving > the wording to ISOC). I'd also suggest they provide a signature page > where IETF community members may endorse the ISOC message. > I would further suggest that a faster but not perfect note is better > than the alternative. Yes, I agree with both paragraphs. I'll add that I very much trust the IETF leadership to come up with the right text on this. Melinda
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature