> However (see above) I baiscally agree with you. When MIF was first > proposed I said "all we really need is a default router per prefix" > and IMNSHO that's still true. you would think it was simple; absolutely maximize any and all feature and configuration parity between dhcp4 and dhcp6. between managing a v4 an a v6 (and mixed) network in general. but no, it goes against the religion, the religion that has further slowed what was a designed-in transition hell. >> instead of giving the customer what they want, we invent shiny new >> stuff and wonder why they walked away. it must be that they are >> stupid. > Hardly, but they are sometimes a bit set in their ways. Change costs > money. somehow, the ipv6 religion seems to make normally sensible folk immune to the perception of 'customer.' randy, who lost blood fighting idiocy such as NLA/TLA