> On Apr 4, 2016, at 1:28 PM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> Well, *exactly*. That's why I don't think that ADs or WGCs need to >> be called out in any particular way: they participate and therefore >> if they are reasonably and personally aware of IPR, they must disclose >> (and if they can't disclose, they need to stop participating in >> that particular case). > > Right, and I think we all are actually in agreement over this. > > Personally, I’d love to see the draft talk about AD participation just like it talks about other people's participation. If I really haven’t participated in WG X, well, I haven’t, even if my co-AD owns the group :-) And if I did participate, well, I should declare the IPR that I know of :-) +1 This is what did not make sense to me about the draft. Alissa > > Jari >