> Well, *exactly*. That's why I don't think that ADs or WGCs need to > be called out in any particular way: they participate and therefore > if they are reasonably and personally aware of IPR, they must disclose > (and if they can't disclose, they need to stop participating in > that particular case). Right, and I think we all are actually in agreement over this. Personally, I’d love to see the draft talk about AD participation just like it talks about other people's participation. If I really haven’t participated in WG X, well, I haven’t, even if my co-AD owns the group :-) And if I did participate, well, I should declare the IPR that I know of :-) Jari
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail