Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 07:41:15AM -0500, Dave Crocker wrote:
> 
> So I suggest that providing explicit feedback to all appointees not up
> for renewal become a regular part of nomcom's deliverables.

I get the desire to use data that is picked up accidentally.  And in
general I hate to throw away data and I certainly support providing
the kind of feedback we're talking about.  But my impression is that
the nomcom's job is already onerous, and if we add to their workload
we may be asking too much.

Surely there's some other way to get the anonymous feedback to sitting
people.  Maybe an anonymous remailer is all we need?  There's nothing
for the nomcom to act on anyway if they get feedback about someone not
sitting.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]