On 26/03/2015 10:41 pm, "Dave Crocker" <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Howdy, > >Michael noted that the two-year cycle for appointees means that those >/not/ up for renewal go at least 18 months without feedback. He put >forward the need for feedback to them sooner than that, but asserted >that having Nomcom do it would not be appropriate. > >As a natural consequence of its interviewing process, Nomcoms always get >quite a bit of information about /all/ appointees, not just the ones >currently up for renewal. No one else acquires this kind of information >regularly and reliably. > >Of the 4 nomcoms I've been on, at least two acted on this feedback, >having a directed conversation with at least one such appointee each time. > >So I suggest that providing explicit feedback to all appointees not up >for renewal become a regular part of nomcom's deliverables. As a newly appointed AD, and not up for renewal soon, I would most definitely appreciate feedback on how things are going. Be that directly or otherwise. And as a huge fan of well implemented 306' reviews, for me 'sooner rather than later' is appreciated. More than happy to be a guinea pig, regardless if it becomes and nomcom process or not. Cheers Terry
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>