> On Mar 26, 2015, at 4:38 PM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> On Mar 26, 2015, at 9:09 AM, Adrian Farrel <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Getting this feedback through any channel, anonymized or otherwise, would be brilliant. > > It seems to me that the most straightforward way to handle that would be to give the feedback on an incumbent to the incumbent. The way to handle confidentiality, I would expect, is to ask the person commenting for one of three instructions: > > 1) do not give this feedback to the incumbent > 2) give this feedback to the incumbent in an anonymized form > 3) give this feedback to the incumbent > > And note that only (3) gives the incumbent the opportunity to discuss the feedback with the person that gave it. There is a part of me that wants to not offer (3), but I can imagine it might make some people comfortable sharing that would not otherwise be. mumble. correction. "not to offer (1)".
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail