On Mar 26, 2015, at 9:32 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Surely there's some other way to get the anonymous feedback to sitting > people. Maybe an anonymous remailer is all we need? There's nothing > for the nomcom to act on anyway if they get feedback about someone not > sitting. Some of the feedback that ADs get publicly is incredibly harsh; I'd be a little concerned about an unfiltered anonymous feedback path. So I think there would have to be _some_ filtering mechanism, and a remailer probably wouldn't cut it. But I do think Randy has a point about nomcom workload. Maybe we need another committee... ;)