Lou Berger <lberger@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> That
>> requires co-locating in different places where we can do that outreach.
>> I imagine you were thinking of three or four standard locations.
> Why not consider a middle ground / compromise?
> We could have a list of standard locations, say 1 or 2 per major
> region.
+1 on this.
I want to suggest given the nomcom cycle, that the fall/November meeting
should never be an outreach meeting, or be anywhere even remotely "exotic".
> I'd also hope we could reuse some of the operational savings gained by
> cutting down on pre-meeting visits/preps to make up for the discount we
> receive by "touring" locations under construction.
On IAOC person could perhaps comment on how much we time/travel we spend on
pre-meeting site visits and qualification visits. My impression is that it's
around 1 FTE.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
pgpa7G_AREvjp.pgp
Description: PGP signature