On 8/23/2014 5:12 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: > That > requires co-locating in different places where we can do that outreach. > I imagine you were thinking of three or four standard locations. Why not consider a middle ground / compromise? We could have a list of standard locations, say 1 or 2 per major region. Cycle among them with an occasional "outreach" location thrown in, say every 4th or 5th meeting. We could even use a survey to help choose these locations based on subjective and objective, e.g., costs and travel time, metrics! I'd also hope we could reuse some of the operational savings gained by cutting down on pre-meeting visits/preps to make up for the discount we receive by "touring" locations under construction. Lou