On 1/27/2014 5:30 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
I suppose there's also the bigger question of why other ADs are wasting their time sponsoring, reviewing, and doing all of the process nonsense associated with publishing a draft that not even a WG is interested enough to do all of that with.
1. Not all documents require the work of a working group. If there is believed to be no actual work to do on a document, then keeping it out of a wg isn't about lack of interest but lack of... work to do.
2. All that reviewing is called quality assurance. I always thought that our open review processes had more to do with quality than with a status label.
Has the model changed and the standards label is all that matters these days?
d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net