Hi, I have a process question on this last call which is not clear from the last call text. Are we being asked to consider whether publication of this document is useful, or are we being asked for IETF consensus on the *content* of the document? It seems from the document that the content is descriptive of something implemented by a single vendor. I applaud putting that information into the public domain, but I don't understand the meaning of IETF consensus with respect to this document. Thanks, Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: IETF-Announce [mailto:ietf-announce-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of The > IESG > Sent: 21 January 2014 12:33 > To: IETF-Announce > Subject: Last Call: <draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies-09.txt> (Cisco Specific > Information Elements reused in IPFIX) to Informational RFC > > > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider > the following document: > - 'Cisco Specific Information Elements reused in IPFIX' > <draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies-09.txt> as Informational RFC > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2014-02-18. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > This document describes some additional Information Elements of Cisco > Systems, Inc. that are not listed in RFC3954. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.