On 2014-1-25, at 21:24, Adrian Farrel <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It seems from the document that the content is descriptive of something > implemented by a single vendor. I applaud putting that information into the > public domain, but I don't understand the meaning of IETF consensus with respect > to this document. +1 The Independent RFC Stream would seem more appropriate. Lars
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail