Hi Russ, Thanks for this. The -03 revision just posted addresses my comments. Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 25 January 2014 16:39 > To: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: IETF > Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-number-registries-02.txt> (Internet > Numbers Registries) to Informational RFC > > Adrian: > > > Section 2.1 says... > > > > Reservations of special-purpose AS Numbers are made through Internet > > Standards actions. > > > > Section 2.2 says... > > > > Reservation of special-purpose IPv4 addresses are made through > > Internet Standards actions. > > > > Section 2.3 says... > > > > Reservation of special-purpose IPv6 addresses are made through > > Internet Standards actions. > > > > Section 3 says... > > > > "IETF Review" as defined in [RFC5226] is required to reserve special- > > purpose AS numbers, IPv4 addresses, or IPv6 addresses. > > > > I will post -03 soon. It uses "IETF Review" throughout. > > > 1. 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 should have a reference to 5226 > > Fixed. > > > 2. Section 3 contradicts 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3. > > Fixed. > > > 3. Why is Section 3 present since there are no instructions for IANA? > > Based on the suggestion from David Conrad, Section 3 now asks IANA to establish > a registry for special-purpose AS numbers. > > Russ