Re: Status (was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02.txt> (Pervasive Monitoring is an Attack) to Best Current Practice)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 12:13:31PM -0800, Dave Crocker wrote:
>> ps.  My own suggestion is Experimental.
>
> Please, no.  That status has been abused enough.  What would you be
> trying to learn by this experiement?  What would the conditions be
> that you would conclude you knew the answer?  If you can't answer
> those questions, "Experimental" is just wrong.

Right. This is not a protocol that needs field testing, it's a
statement of policy.

The thing that needs to be clarified is apparently what the policy is.

Scott




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]