Re: Alternative decision process in RTCWeb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Carsten" == Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx> writes:

    Carsten> On 30 Nov 2013, at 16:08, Dave Crocker <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    >> On 11/28/2013 7:27 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
    >>> In a similar vein, can anyone point out what we get if the IETF
    >>> were to agree on a single MTI video codec for WebRTC?  What is
    >>> the upside to making this herculean effort?
    >> 
    >> 
    >> basic interoperability, without prior agreement.

    Carsten> If making something MTI in a spec guaranteed that
    Carsten> interoperability, I wouldn?t have asked.

>From Cullen's message it sounds like a number of people believe that the
MTI  mechanism in the spec will influence what some implementations do.

For me that has real value and seems like a reason to spend significant
effort trying to come to a decision.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]