Re: Alternative decision process in RTCWeb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Dec 2, 2013 8:08 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to reach rough consensus on MTI of one from (H.264 ,VP8 ) leaving the choice of which, to each implementation?
>
> Avri
>
>

That does not achieve the goal of ensuring 2 or more peers have a common codec to avoid codec negotiation failure

CB

> Yoav Nir <synp71@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 28/11/13 8:10 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
>>>
>>> It seems to me that if there are sane strongly-held objections to both
>>> of the alternatives on the table, then neither alternative is suitable
>>> for a standards-track RFC.
>>
>> So, does that mean that there should not be a standardized codec for
>> WebRTC, or that we should come up with with a new alternative that
>> nobody wants?
>>
>
> ~~~
> avri


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]