Re: Alternative decision process in RTCWeb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28/11/13 8:10 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
It seems to me that if there are sane strongly-held objections to both of the alternatives on the table, then neither alternative is suitable for a standards-track RFC.
So, does that mean that there should not be a standardized codec for WebRTC, or that we should come up with with a new alternative that nobody wants?

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]