Re: Alternative decision process in RTCWeb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@xxxxxx> wrote:
As a quick cheat sheet to where browser vendors might stand on this matter...

I think this is stating the obvious, but just for the record, there's a much broader community than just the four leading browser vendors.

Pretty much all the existing Jingle/XMPP community is tracking this work very closely, for example, and I think it'd be fair to say that any MTI affecting WebRTC will essentially be transcribed into XEP-0266/XEP-0299 as the MTI for Jingle.

I don't think it's be a stretch to assume that most VOIP players are in a similar situation - WebRTC will essentially define the baseline for voice and video over the internet.

This is, of course, just following the simple fact that there are many more browsers deployed than desktop XMPP clients, for example, and efforts such as http://otalk.im/ and http://go.estos.de/ take advantage of interop between Jingle and the browser.

As a further note, the XMPP/Jingle community has done perfectly well, so far, with no MTI, but I'm asking their opinion at the moment - an early, and particular well-written, response from Emil Ivov is here:


Dave.

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]