I'd prefer seeing the charter changed and no codec mandated.
The only reason to specify a must-implement is to increase interop; if mandating a codec does not increase the amount of interop, why do it?
-=R
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 28, 2013, at 8:07 PM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) <keith.drage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If you still believe it so, please tell me when you think the WG decided this.
I'm just going by what people have told me. If the working group hasn't indeed been asked whether they would accept the outcome of a coin toss, I would argue that that question should be asked.