Hello,
This is a rough summary of the comments which
have been made on the Last Call for
draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19 since I emailed Pete Resnick [1].
There were comments about the RFC 5507 concerns
from Patrik Fältström [2], Dave Crocker [3], Mark
Andrews [4] and John Klensin [5].
There were comments from Dan Schlitt [6] in which
he provided his perspective of the SPFBIS
discussions. In his opinion "it is unwise to
have a standards track protocol which overloads
the TXT record". He suggested that the
specification should be published as
Informational. The comments provided by Dave
Crocker [3] [7] and John Klensin [5][8] may also
be related to the intended status of the
specification. Phillip Hallam-Baker commented about the design objections [9].
I'll ask the Responsible Area Director for
guidance about the above instead of suggesting that the SPFBIS WG address them.
Joe Abley commented about the usage of "messages
sent over UDP" [10]. This issue has been raised
by Douglas Otis. My suggestion to the SPFBIS WG is to address this issue.
Please email me if you consider your comments as
not having been addressed correctly. I suggest
waiting for Pete Resnicks to send a message to
the mailing list if you sent Last Call comments before August 24.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy (as document shepherd)
1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg81877.html
2. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg81887.html
3. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg81889.html
4. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg81891.html
5. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg81912.html
6. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg81939.html
7. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg81923.html
8. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg81924.html
9. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg81927.html
10. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg81862.html