On 8/30/2013 4:09 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 03:39:14PM -0400, Hector Santos wrote:
archives of the Repute WG to find or extract these very real and
practical integration considerations. The document should have
these general considerations summarized.
But your suggestion was for protocol-specific advice. I don't know
how to write that in a generic way. If you have specific text you
want, I can evaluate.
I had the start of one in my original post:
REPUTE protocols based on this framework need to consider reputons
based on SMTP level filtering protocols such SPF [RFC4408],
IP based filtering [DNSRBL] or others.
If too specific (but explain why DKIM is mentioned?), then
REPUTE protocols based on this framework should consider any
reputons based on SMTP level filtering protocols in their designs.
with and/or:
The design consideration for operations may necessitate disabling
or relaxing SMTP level filters in order to enable filtering based
on this DKIM-REPUTE model.
Thanks
--
HLS