On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 02:37:13PM -0400, Hector Santos wrote: > > For example, DKIM-REPUTE product designers would need to consider > SPF reputons product models. Simple text as follows can resolve the > integration consideration with little SPF fanfare the draft > obviously tried to avoid: Why should the framework document contain details of how various particular reputation services interact? If you want a discussion of reputation-service-interaction mechanisms in the draft, that's one thing. If you want to talk about how SPF and DKIM interact, then I think this is probably the wrong draft. Best, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx