Re: [dnsext] Deprecating SPF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Part of the question is whether the IETF is going to work with ICANN, IANA
and the ccTLD to audit delegations for servers that are not RFC 103[45]
compliant and suspend delegations where the servers are not compliant.

	* no responding to queries based on query type
	* not having a NS rrset at the delegation point

Enforcing that ccTLD and ICANN TLD regularly audit delegations and
have mismatches corrected.  This is REQUIRED by RFC 1034 in part to
stop the sorts of problems we are seeing today.

We don't have to put up people putting up misconfigured / broken servers.

For the non responding servers I have written
draft-andrews-dns-no-response-issue to try to capture the issues.
It was on the dnsop agenda for Berlin but didn't get covered as time
ran out.  I would like everyone to read it and comment on it.

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]