Hi Patrik,
At 11:45 20-08-2013, Patrik Fältström wrote:
The reason why I did not post there at first was
that a) I did not feel I had followed the rules
laid out for discussions [read all messages in
the mailing list archives] and b) the discussion
on the dnsext list was more general on overload
of TXT records [something DNS people have always
been against -- see IAB document on DNS choices].
But, when having that discussion on the dnsext
mailing list, to which I cc:ed Pete as
responsible AD for full disclosure, Pete did ask
me for a complete explanation of my view, which I posted.
Once again, without re-reading the mailing list archives.
First of all, I apologize for copying the message
to ietf@. The advice given was to read the
comments in the SPFBIS mailing list archives. It
is not a rule. If a person did not read all the
messages and the person raises a point or
provides arguments which were not discussed
previously I will ask the SPFBIS WG to address them.
I don't know whether to process your comments or
the other comments posted on dnsext@ as part of
the Last Call or not. It is unclear to me as to
whether I should only consider messages with the
appropriate Last Call subject line. My sense is
that I should listen to your concerns.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy