On 20 aug 2013, at 20:36, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It would be better to have the discussion on the ietf@ mailing list as that's the venue which the IESG identified for last Call comments. Understood, and thanks. The reason why I did not post there at first was that a) I did not feel I had followed the rules laid out for discussions [read all messages in the mailing list archives] and b) the discussion on the dnsext list was more general on overload of TXT records [something DNS people have always been against -- see IAB document on DNS choices]. But, when having that discussion on the dnsext mailing list, to which I cc:ed Pete as responsible AD for full disclosure, Pete did ask me for a complete explanation of my view, which I posted. Once again, without re-reading the mailing list archives. Patrik