Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug 14, 2013, at 13:40, Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>> YANG seems to be incompatible with CBOR.
> 
> so what does that say about yang, yang's suitability for netconf, cbor,
> and cbor's suitability?

Good question.  I'm not sure the jury is even out on that yet.

Yaron reminded me that netconf is using XPath for various purposes, so a CBOR rendition of netconf would need to do the same that you would need for doing netconf with JSON: either replace XPath with something else (indeed causing some incompatibility), or explain how to use XPath with the CBOR/JSON translation of the YANG model (which might be interesting).

CBOR certainly has no trouble carrying around the data described by a YANG model.
(Indeed, CBOR's decimal fractions were inspired by YANG's.)
But then, I don't have an opinion whether adding a binary object representation to the netconf ecosystem is on the agenda.

Grüße, Carsten





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]