On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Randy, > > I prefer to leave this question to people who know something about Netconf, > i.e. not me. > > But let me just say that, based on my thoroughly extensive 5-min. research, > YANG seems to be incompatible with CBOR. > Can you be more specific? What is incompatible about YANG? > Thanks, > Yaron > Andy > On 2013-08-14 04:53, Randy Presuhn wrote: >> >> Hi - >> >>> From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Sent: Aug 13, 2013 2:11 PM >>> To: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@xxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary >>> Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard >> >> ... >>> >>> - The "diagnostic notation" can be used very effectively for things like >>> configuration files, e.g. if an application already uses CBOR on the >>> wire. Therefore I would suggest to formalize it a bit more, so that we >>> also have interoperability at this level. >> >> >> Do you envision it as an encoding for Netconf? >> >> Randy >> >