Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard
From: Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 20:40:00 +0900
Cc: IETF Disgust <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <520B323D.7090702@gmail.com>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

> YANG seems to be incompatible with CBOR.

so what does that say about yang, yang's suitability for netconf, cbor,
and cbor's suitability?

randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Carsten Bormann

References:
- re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Randy Presuhn
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Yaron Sheffer

Prev by Date: Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFCPublisher
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]