> > I see no reason why the 87attendees@xxxxxxxx list shouldn't be open to remote participants. Is that not the case already? We should be doing all we can to encourage participation. Several people pointed out already (in private e-mail) that the list might be all that is needed, and it probably is already open. Maybe it just needs better advertising. <sign up here if you want to follow discussions about the meeting, even if you are a remote attendee> Jari