Re: Participation per Region of Authoring IETF documents vs Marketing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Lars,

It was for Asia region, I thought its rate is between (5 - 50)
rfc/year for last 3 years. Basing on; The first figure of RFCs is the
Comparison of countries over the year [1], the second, is the
Distribution of number of RFCs per continent [2], the third is
publication rate per year [3]. For the I-Ds going in IETF is seen from
the distribution of drafts according to the countries of their authors
[4] and [5]. All figures make together the below conclusions, even
though some of them need more details for readers to understand.

 As from Figure [1] always one region (North America) is doing about
200 rfc/year and the each of others may do between 5 - 50 rfc/year or
50-100, but all together other regions do 150 rfc/year, so total
ietf-participation can be about 350 rfc/year. The Figure [2] is not
reasonable, not showing of years or period of such numbers.

So my understanding is that for Europe-region and Asia-region, the
number of I-Ds rates are high compared to North America, but not the
rate of RFCs. I see that the total RFCs ietf-output rate (RFC/year) as
in Figure [3] for the last three years is about 350 rfc/year, so if
North America is having 200, the all others only will have about 150
rfc/year. The total RFCs produced per countries is in Figure [6] is
reasonable but if compared with Figure [2] I get lost.

>From Figure [5] (also [4]) the number of I-Ds (now currently 2013
outstanding) from Asia and Europe are about 600 and 1200 respectively
(let us add them up so =1800 ids), which I think only about 150 will
succeed (non-North America drafts). Furthermore, for North America the
I-Ds are 1500 ids and only 200 ids will succeed to become RFCs. I
think that Asia and Europe should have together about 250/year rfc not
150 rfc/year. If we do more MARKETING effort we can make that rfc-rate
of other regions increase, but we already tried to increase North
America rate but it is stable for about 200 rfc/years.

[1] http://www.arkko.com/tools/rfcstats/countrydistrhist.html
[2] http://www.arkko.com/tools/recrfcstats/d-contdistr.html
[3] http://arkko.com/tools/rfcstats/pubdistr.html
[4] http://www.arkko.com/tools/stats/d-countrydistr.html
[5] http://www.arkko.com/tools/stats/d-countryeudistr.html
[6] http://www.arkko.com/tools/rfcstats/d-countrydistr.html

 This lower participation from regions like Asia will continue because
most meeting are in North America, or most participants from North
America prefer to have face-face meeting locally, than to be remote to
other regions (not reasonable because they are writers in English very
well). Also other regions participants prefer to participate in
meetings not remotely (but that is reasonable because they are not
good in English Language Writting). It is also important that some
IETF management visit the other region participants for the progress
of their I-Ds.

Please note that I don't claim that my analysis is all correct, but
trying to discuss it and get others to analyse as well or comment on
the figures/statistics. If you disagree or have any comment please
reply/advise. Thanking you,

AB


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Eggert, Lars <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On May 28, 2013, at 19:46, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > by looking into the statistics of I-Ds and RFCs, it is strange that we get
> > sometimes high rate in the I-D going in IETF from some regions but the
> > success rate of I-Ds to become RFCs is very low (5- 50).
>
> which IDs and RFCs are you basing this statement on?
>
> Thanks,
> Lars





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]