Re: [IETF] Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Subject: Re: [IETF] Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated?April the first Date: Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 07:31:54PM +0000 Quoting Yoav Nir (ynir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx):

> In this case I could tick that box without being a lying bastard. Just a sort-of deceitful one. It is possible to configure the firewall to drop packets with the evil bit set. I still went with explaining the April 1 RFC concept.

You pass. 

I seem to be able to locate several implementations. Shall we initiate
work to elevate 3514 from Informational to Proposed Standard?

-- 
Måns Nilsson     primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE                             +46 705 989668
I hope the ``Eurythmics'' practice birth control ...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]